Business owners always base their decision on price when they are to choose a software developer. A promise of quality coming at a fair or lower price will raise eyebrows. With this reality, many business owners still prefer to take the risk of going for the cheapest software developer.

One of the dangers is that the project that was initially priced low would, eventually, in many instances, go 2-3 times over budget, and it most likely will miss all possible deadlines. Or sometimes turns out to be bad as a result of multiple bugs or poor quality.

Hence, there is a difference between the initial cost of software and the final app development. Before you decide to go for a low-cost app developer, there are many factors you need to put into consideration as well as counting the loss you are about to face.

What Risks Are Attached To Cheap Software Development Services?

Decisions we make in life, be it good or bad, have a cost to be paid. So is the case of choosing a cheap software app developer. When choosing a provider with an unimaginably affordable offer, you need to know what you are about to sacrifice. There Are Various Ways Developers Can Cut The Cost Of App Development. Here they are:

1. Situating their development facilities offshore to Pakistan or India, where production cost is low. However, the result of this is also a lower level of skill, education, and corporate culture among developers.

2. Offering a cheaper rate or a special discount for service to get the contract by all means. The result of this is almost always a hidden uncharged fee once the work starts.

3. Purposely underestimating the development scope and effort resulting in zero covers for any risk that might arise during project management and development hours.

4. Offering amateur junior-level developers who are on internship and are yet to be field experts. The result is amateur work and development delay.

5. Offering a service known as " one-size-fits-all." It involves white-label solutions, built- on DIY apps, or cloned apps. The result is a piece of software lacking in innovation and competitive standards.

6. Assigning one developer, project manager, and designer for various projects at a time. The result of this includes mixed up specs, poor work, and lower standards.

Other Dangers of Choosing Low-Cost software

Delayed delivery and delay in business productivity: This will most likely show during the quality control stage where the product will be deemed faulty and not ready to be used publicly. In the end, the software will have to be reworked, which will delay the productivity of your business.

Extended cost: As much as the primary reason for using low-cost development is to save cost when the software is poorly developed, you will inevitably spend more to reprogram it or completely make a new one. In the end, more will be spent on the project, in contrast to if you had used a reliable and generally costly work.

Substandard software: You could be lucky enough to have the software developed when due, but when tested for quality and usability, you will most certainly be in regrets. Most low-cost software development never meets up to the standards of regular software. If they can?t meet up to the basic standard, they can never be potential competition for your rival businesses. This said you lose your company standards inevitably.

Copied work: Low-cost developers tend to find ways to cut corners, of course, they also need to make some profit. To do that, they will most likely choose to copy past developers or even use a pre-made base for software development. This instantly causes you to lose your credibility in your field.

Unresponsive software: Let's imagine for a minute that the software ends up with the public because there have been so many corners cut; in time, the software will cave under the load and will inevitably crash, lag, or become unresponsive. The risk attached includes data loss and unhappy clients.

Conclusion

If awfully cheap software developer will cost you more than you can ever imagine and your reputation in the highly competitive market, why not go for the costly one that gives you all you need to be world-class?